Share your product feedback!

Please tell us what we can do to make Primfeed the best social media for you.

Planned

Edit date & time of images/posts/products (for brand pages)

I think this will be a difficult one to consider. But now with the gallery update I would like to consider dropping Flickr completely and stick with just Primfeed. There's something holding me back, which is: I'd like to add my old photos/products to my Primfeed but have them appear in their original order - by editing their date - which is something Flickr actually allow us to do. I wouldn't wanna upload my older pictures/products and have them at the top of my feed and gallery, it would make a mess. My suggestion would be to have it just a little bit different than Flickr. There we can edit both dates - so I'd suggest that on Primfeed it could show both the date it was uploaded (which we wouldn't be able edit for moral reasons) and also show the date it was taken (which we would be able to edit), and actually have the feed show the posts on the feed/gallery on the order it was taken. Primfeed always gives people the choice to pick one or the other, but in this case (show in order by date taken or uploaded) I wouldn't like people to choose their own default, but the brand page to pick which the default for their own profiles individually, so they can have their brand be shown as they want it to be seen (which is why I'd also like the option for each brand page for default feed/gallery view to work like this). ­· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · So in summary: • Have brand pages be able to edit dates - could even be a PRO-only feature; • Pictures show both the date taken & date uploaded, if the date is the same then have it be shown just 1 - or maybe show just "date taken: xx xx xx" and the date uploaded upon hovering the mouse above it; • Not able to change the "date uploaded", just the "date taken"; • The feed/gallery show by default "by date taken" so it represents the brand like it's supposed to - or have the own brand pick which will be the default for their own page, not the users (but they would be able to temporarily change with the dropdown menu). ­· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · The other option would be to make it work exactly like it does on Flickr, but I think that won't align with Primfeed's vision - in any case here's a brief explaination of how it works there: It saves the date/time of upload as "date uploaded" and leaves "date taken" blank - in which we can edit both freely. By default the profile shows in order of "by uploaded", but there's the dropdown menu to change to "by taken" manually and I believe that setting is saved locally for that person on their browser only. The screenshots below are from Flickr options, just to illustrate. ­· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Thank you for all the amazing work so far! 💖

Eden Nova 9 days ago

15

Feature Request

Open

"Quoted" Reposts revision

I've noticed recently that some people Repost others work but also add a quote or their own writing to go with it. While this is lovely that they want to share and bring attention to other artists work and support them, i feel that when they make their own quote with it, it seems unfair that the 'sharer' receives the Likes and not the original post. Perhaps there needs to be a revision where even if someone quotes or adds their own writing, only the original work will get the recognition and likes that they fairly deserve. I say this because also if someone new comments under the Re-post, it makes it difficult for the original artist to comment or reply if it's being redirected to someone elses Re-post. I feel that all likes and communications should go to the original image posted. It might be worth considering whether quoted reposts could work more like standard reposts, where any likes are still attributed to the original creator.

Roxie Harbour 19 days ago

Feature Request

Closed

Is irl content banned? are people still posting it? are devs still on the fence?

Unsure if this is a solution. But currently from some feedback ive seen and some peoples questions everyone is wanting to either ban irl content or post irl content and its a little muddled on where the devs fully stand on this imo? I currently don't plan to post content, but Im not opposed to seeing irl content either. Also I do understand that this is primfeed and the devs have the right to choose whatever is tos. Anyway here's my suggestion, is there a way for users to have the option to mark their profile as planning to contain irl content and the other users be able to remove or add seeing irl content in there settings? this way posters and viewers with the same views on whether they like irl content or not will see the content they want to see? And they wouldn't see profiles that plan to post irl content anymore unless they enable it? (kind of like the AI posts toggle, but different.) If this is implemented, irl content should probably be automatically toggled off. This way majority of users won't have to change much of anything to see what they want to see, and those who want to take that step can put in that small amount of effort to click a simple toggle and everyone is happy. (in an ideal world) Not sure if this is too much extra work for the devs tho.. apologies if this was already discussed or if a conclusion on the acceptance of irl content was reached. This is just me trying to reach a middle ground for both parties, anyway thank you for your time. <3</p>

DyondraOttsel Resident 21 days ago

2

Feature Request

Under review

Removal of gallery permissions for repeat offenders

I think there should be a more severe punishment/correction for repeat offenders who post without regard of the TOS and rules of the site. Moderation mistakes happen, we've all done it. However I've seen a select few accounts who repeatedly post an adult or moderate image as general in order to get it seen by more people and once they've gotten the likes they want they correctly moderate it. This leaves users who use the mobile app at the whim of users who consistently break TOS for popularity. We don't want to be scrolling in public and accidentally see someone's completely nude photo or pornographic shots. Those posts are for private viewing. So what good are the content filters of G/M/A/A+ if posters aren't using them correctly? I think repeat offenders should be forbidden from posting to the Public Gallery for an extended amount of time dependent on the number of times they've violated the rules. Same goes for AI users. I keep seeing these accounts that claim they don't use AI posting AI pictures in the public gallery. They then complain about unfair treatment and favoritism or how they were picked on when in reality they broke the rules. I saw another site literally get made because someone was using AI here and got banned for it. So they made a new site, for AI posts. Maybe the AI posters should go over there instead of complaining over here? It's even wilderer that a large number of the accounts here claiming they would 'never use AI' are already on that site, posting AI images, admitting they are AI and then posting them here while laughing about moderation not being able to tell. The punishments should be more severe or people will continue to break the rules and put those of us who respect the site, its creators and its users in really uncomfortable situations.

Leoric Bruun about 1 month ago

6

Feature Request

Completed

Add ability to hide reposts when viewing profiles

The option under settings for "hide reposts" does not work when viewing user profiles. This may or may not be intentional. However, since I have switched to using PF from Flickr for getting info about new products from brands, viewing the profile of the brand often leads to frustration when the creator reposts a lot of content which features their products. This is understandable, but from a user perspective very unhelpful if my reason for viewing their profile was to see their original content, announcements, etc. I'm not interested in seeing hundreds of posts of people using their content. Instead, add an option when viewing a user's profile (above the main feed area) to "hide reposts" (this may or may not be persistent), which will hide reposts from this user's feed.

Quinn Elara about 1 month ago

1

Feature Request